"Theodore Kaldis" wrote in message
news:1140799088.396022.109310@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Lionel is weak and constantly bashing Bush. Now Mike Savage is great.
> He also bashes Bush but he supports him on the major issues. He
> dislikes that Bush hasn't closed the Mexican borders which I agree
> with, that Bush sold the ports to the Arabs which again Savage is right
> on, and that he hasn't dropped a nuclear bomb on Iraq. Lionel
> believes we should all get on our knees and sing kumbaya with the Arabs.
I don't listen to Lionel because he bashes Bush; I just find him funny at
times. He's pleasant to listen to. He can also get annoying at times but
he's entertaining and funny. I disagree about the Kumbaya stuff -- he's
actually pretty sharp. Besides, these guys are entertainers; I don't care
whether they're "left" or "right" as long as they're "stimulating."
Michael Savage --excuse me, "DOCTOR" (gag) Savage is a pompous ass with the
IQ of a slug. It's painful to hear him going on and on about his PhD and
then making the most outrageous mistakes. I think it was just yesterday that
somebody called (with a dissenting viewpoint) whose name was "Quay" or
something like that. Savage got all smug and intellectual and said
something like "aah... very interesting that your name is what the British
use for waiting in line!" (referring to "queue", which is pronounced
"cue"). Savage can be funny at times but he's a moron. The talk-show host
I find the most intelligent (let everybody pelt me with rocks now, lord
knows I'm used to it) is Bill O'Reilly. He tends to think, disagrees with
Bush on some issues and is more middle-of-the-road (and not blandly so) than
the others. This was a very boring post; sorry.
|