"Preesi" wrote in message
news:SomdnS4XM8CQkpzZnZ2dnUVZ_t6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> grapheme wrote:
>> "Preesi" wrote in message
>> news:87OdnYROBqTYmZzZRVn-rQ@comcast.com...
>>> grapheme wrote:
>>>> "Poe" wrote in message
>>>> news:4400F05A.3080907@nospam.us...
>>>>> SoCally wrote:
>>>>>>> Do YOU as an adult invite your friends over and play cards,
>>>>>>> charades, or trivial pursuit?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ....and the point of that question is?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why don't you try to understand what I'm saying about your
>>>>>> hypocracy instead of trying to change the topic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I was forced to define either you or Natalie as "slutty" ---
>>>>>> you'd win by a mile. So maybe next time you feel like assuming the
>>>>>> worst about a murder victim, you will sit and think about your own
>>>>>> actions and realize you REALLY have no room to judge anyone. Let
>>>>>> alone a young women who can't defend herself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My point is, the term "slut" is such a convenient way to blame a
>>>>> woman for a violent crime against her (and I am really quite
>>>>> confident that is what happened). If a male cannot control himself,
>>>>> he is to blame for his behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't know Preesi had a . site, but if it is true, I would not
>>>>> call her a slut. However, if she was assaulted and killed, would it
>>>>> be fair to discount the crime because of her site? No, of course
>>>>> not it would not be fair or acceptable. That's one of my points. My
>>>>> other point is, the dynamics of the situation Natalee might have
>>>>> been in could have caused her to act worse than normal (not that it
>>>>> makes any difference, it is just another thought). So, even if she
>>>>> got wild one night it does not mean she deserves a label like that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And, she is a lot younger than Preesi. Preesi is a 40 year old
>>>> woman who should know better. Natalee was a young girl and young
>>>> girls party, but still I see no evidence of jello shots.
>>>
>>> Im 38
>>>
>>> NOT all YOUNG girls party, I didnt!!
>>>
>>> Graph? I think your in a mood and Im no longer gonna feed it
>>>
>>
>> Well, I guess all of us who don't think it is nice of you to call
>> Natalee Holloway a slut, are in a mood. That accusation does not
>> even make sense. I don't get in moods.
>>
>> I don't understand the need to call names when you can just stick to
>> discussing the subject at hand. I have not resorted to calling you
>> names. I have tried to stick to the facts.
>
> You havent?
> Youve been very sharp and nasty in a underhanded way.
> DEBATE whats at hand the debaters lives arent ever supposed to come into
> it.
>
No, Preesi. I have never once called you a name. Because I feel enriched
bread is not healthy, is not me calling you names. It is what I have
believed before I ever heard of your name. I have been very careful not to
call you names. On the other hand, you have brought up another poster on
here who I have had a disagreement with who has nothing to do with this
discussion and have said I was in a mood, etc. I never brought up Richard
Roma or have I called into account your mothering abilities or anything when
I easily could have struck that low blow. I tried to be careful in
describing the pictures on your website or speaking of your webcam. I did
not bring up any of the S&M stuff, but I am bringing stuff up now to make a
point. Maybe you are confusing me with other posters who have, but I have
tried to be very careful in dealing with you.
|