pinklife wrote:
> i have heard different opnions on this issue. on the one hand, you get
> all your meals, drinks, activities and everything else paid for. on
> the other hand, if you are planning on going to an all-inclusive
> joint, there really isn't much to see outside of the resort; unless
> you take local transportation which may or may not be the best idea.
>
> i fancy all-inclusives like cruises; in that you are really confined
> in what is around you. anyone else have an opnion on all-inclusive
> resorts?
I would think that your destination would make an all-inclusive desirable or
not. They make no sense at all if you're in a populated and popular tourist
area, because your dining and entertainment options expand exponentially the
moment you exit the gate. For an example, you'd have to be certifiable to
choose an all-inclusive in Puerto Vallarta, a little city that thrums with
good restaurants and activities, most walkable. Just up the coast in Nuevo
Vallarta you might as well go all-inclusive, because that's all there is,
and the bus ride to PV is long while cabs are expensive.
|