On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:50:42 GMT, Dillon Pyron wrote:
> Thus spake Chrissy Cruiser :
>
>>On 19 Sep 2005 13:34:07 -0700, essential.info2@rock.com wrote:
>>
>>> Is this the land of the free, or the land of oppression?
>>
>>Both.
>>
>>> "'Drop Your Top' Idea Receives Cold Shoulder after Opposition from
>>> Pro-Family Citizens. A radical proposal to allow women and girls to go
>>> topless at California's public beaches and parks has failed to
>>> materialize after loud outcry from pro-family citizens."
>>
>>Let me see if I understand this. The Pro-Family group doesn't endorse
>>nudism.
>
> Actually, a topless ban seems hard to enforce. I can go topless. And
> then there's this 14th Amendment thingy.
You would think so but history is full of police actions, beach closings
and other similar enforcements especially in the USA.
Note the quote above re: "radical". It's radical to want the freedom of
nudism.
What?
This comes from the same, closed minded, absurd thinking that invaded the
Vietnam War protests. it was "radical" then to want that hideous atrocity
to end. it was "radical" to claim that it was a war foisted on and
supported by teenagers.
So now it is "radical" to propose that, shudder I say it, that women should
be *allowed* to bear their breasts in public.
To me it is radical that we have laws in the first place that make it
illegal to do so. Let's not even get started on, you know, that thingy down
there. Best keep it under chastity lock.
Idiots.
--
"A long time ago I decided to limit my emotional baggage to a very small
carry-on = How B |