Re: Dick Goldhaber provided solid evidence for his LIES, as well as Ray Goldenberg's history and evidence of SPAMMING.

Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents ]
Travel:[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]

[ Webmail Login ] [ Immigration, Travel Forum Australia | Canada | USA ]

Forum

Live chat

[ Home ][ Group Home ][ Random article ] [ First Article ][ Previous Article ] [ Next Article ] [ Newest Article ]

Re: Dick Goldhaber provided solid evidence for his LIES, as well as Ray Goldenberg's history and evidence of SPAMMING.

Posted on: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:36:43 -0500

"Reef Fish" wrote in message
news:1139519264.625910.107880@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> That's call "correct attribution" and "give credit where credit is
> due".
>
> No different from giving Fred the credit for giving your middle name
> "Skippy".

Or, you don't have the capacity, despite that self-professed superior
intelligence of yours, to come up with anything creative on your own. For
someone who has reached your advanced age to resort to childish name
calling......pretty pathetic.

> But are easily verifiable from the tinyurl threads provided by your
> dad Dickhead! Made it so easy. Of course to VERIFY those
> facts about spamming by Ray Goldenberg, all you have to do is
> to do a few simple google search -- as I've also shown in those
> posts provided by Dickhead Goldhaber:

Who is this "Dickhead Goldhaber" to whom you constantly refer? Fictional
characters who live only in your pointed head do not mean much to the rest
of us in the real world.

> I thought you knew better than that, Danni, for someone who
> claimed to have a high IQ (but no record of proof of course).

Still waiting for proof of your superior intelligence there, Bobby boy. Not
holding my breath; blue isn't my color.

> Of course. Now go READ those 3,400 threads I pointed you and
> everyone else to, and read Ray's own words, and come back
> to debate whether those are facts or not.

Nah, have a life. One man's (or woman's) information is another's spam.
That's what makes the world a wonder to live in. Don't like what Ray
contributes, show some self-control and don't read it.

> Depends on the kind of paint you use -- but how would you know?
> But I think just pointing to the google evidence is enough to convince
> you to concede "nolo contendre":

See above. Like I said, debating with you is like watching paint dry....any
kind of paint. Of course, that won't stop you from responding. That
over-inflated ego of yours........

[ Home ][ Group Home ][ Random article ] [ First Article ][ Previous Article ] [ Next Article ] [ Newest Article ]