Sue, this is a good suggestion, IMHO. Since there were
variables of line, itinerary and time, a clear cut "winner"
in each category might really not reflect the abilities of
people who want to go on a GGC. With a second choice,
reflecting the runner up categories, a second round of
balloting might gain more GGC participants, since it would
be clear cut about what the cruise would be,
Nonnymus
Sue and Kevin Mullen wrote:
>
>
> Gary W wrote:
>
>> Now. looking at the challenges that this selection represents it seems
>> logical to entertain some alternatives as well so the committee is
>> currently investigating and will propose a couple of options in
>> addition to this preference set for further consideration.
>>
>> I'd love to hear what you have to say about some ideas which may mix up
>> 1st and 2nd place preferences or some such cruise.
>
> Since the votes were so close for the "time frame" and for the "itins.",
> I think the committee could work with the first and the "second"
> choices. As far as the cruise line goes, if nothing works with the first
> choice, take a look at the second choice and see what happens.
>
> sue |
