HC_Yacht_Deliveries wrote:
> Charles wrote:
> > In article , Nonnymus
> > wrote:
> >
> > > While its always great to have new folks join into r.t.c.,
> > > it sure would be good if they'd participate for a while
> > > before voicing such strong opinions about something that
> >
> > It is not a new person you are replying to. A new person would not make
> > that their first post. It is a sock puppet, that is just one of the
> > cranks posting under a different e-mail handle.
Heather has proven Charles to be WRONG on ALL COUNTS!
> >
> > --
> > Charles
>
> After giving a long rest to all this and checking to see if it was
> worth returning, I can see it is not. To the "Virgin poster, long time
> lurker", try an archive search and you will see that Charles attacked
> me a LONG time ago from my very FIRST post and then proceeded to stalk
> me all the time. Charles gets intimidated easy by 1.Women and 2. New
> Posters. Ignore Charles or just tell him to drink ipecac for a solid
> week and after he is fully dehydrated, he can go practice coprophagia.
> You will also run into other doozies, but I found Charles the most
> annoying and ignorant (and only one who continued the cyberstalking).
>
> Heather
It's a shame that someone trying to come back to participate in a
discussion group about CRUSING is immediately driven off by
the obnoxious pro-AD and pro-Ray-SPAMMING zealots.
-- Bob.
|