In article <1147137960.799404.180610@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
"Reef Fish" wrote:
> HC_Yacht_Deliveries wrote:
> > Charles wrote:
> > > In article , Nonnymus
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > While its always great to have new folks join into r.t.c.,
> > > > it sure would be good if they'd participate for a while
> > > > before voicing such strong opinions about something that
> > >
> > > It is not a new person you are replying to. A new person would not make
> > > that their first post. It is a sock puppet, that is just one of the
> > > cranks posting under a different e-mail handle.
>
> Heather has proven Charles to be WRONG on ALL COUNTS!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Charles
> >
> > After giving a long rest to all this and checking to see if it was
> > worth returning, I can see it is not. To the "Virgin poster, long time
> > lurker", try an archive search and you will see that Charles attacked
> > me a LONG time ago from my very FIRST post and then proceeded to stalk
> > me all the time. Charles gets intimidated easy by 1.Women and 2. New
> > Posters. Ignore Charles or just tell him to drink ipecac for a solid
> > week and after he is fully dehydrated, he can go practice coprophagia.
> > You will also run into other doozies, but I found Charles the most
> > annoying and ignorant (and only one who continued the cyberstalking).
> >
> > Heather
>
> It's a shame that someone trying to come back to participate in a
> discussion group about CRUSING is immediately driven off by
> the obnoxious pro-AD and pro-Ray-SPAMMING zealots.
>
> -- Bob.
Usenet is wild and wooly, Bob. Sometimes you just go with the flow. If
she is so thin-skinned that she lets anyone on usenet get her goat, she
should be ashamed.
I find that it is just easier, most of the time, to just ignore those I
consider a PITA. |