Lloyd Parsons wrote:
> In article <1147137690.095965.217410@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> "Reef Fish" wrote:
>
> >
> > Peter Berlin wrote:
> > > Yes, with all the spamming that Ray does, I am sure he is a millionaire by
> > > now. I guess the abuse is worth it, or it could be that that Ray is a pretty
> > > nice guy that doesn't ever bother anyone and just likes to post information
> > > be helpful. Yes, it could be.
> >
> > You know, all you pro-Ray posters are ignoring the fact that Ray's
> > ADs and SPAMs are VIOLATIONS of USENET Guidelines.
> >
> > All your seemingly clever arguments are fallacious.
> >
> > That speaks for the mentality of ALL of those who support Ray's ADs.
> >
> > -- Bob.
> >
> OK, Bob. You keep saying this, so where is the link to that exact
> usenet guideline?
You are quite behind in your reading of my posts. Just look around
at ANY newsgroup and see why they are not AD-spammed openly
by somebody like Ray Goldenberg.
> And if it is just a guideline, then I suppose we
> could say that some don't want to follow it. Then it is up to us in the
> newsgroup to either accept or reject those postings.
You are actually right about this. It is NOT law. It is the
Guideline
honored by ALL newsgoups within USENET, except this one.
> Since it seems you are nearly a minority of one in your decision, I
> would think that a reasonable person would then killfile the purported
> offender or just ignore it.
Sorry, it doesn't work that way.
I am hardly a minority of one. Ray and this newsgroup are a minority
of one among newsgroups and spammers within newsgroups.
As of now, Ray has spammed this group 18005 times.
All time top posters
18005 r...@lighthousetravel.com
I have the right to PROTEST against Ray's ADs and SPAMS.
I am at least 17,000 posts behind Ray's spams in this group.
-- Bob.
|