Lloyd Parsons wrote:
> In article <1147140188.323399.197780@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> "Reef Fish" wrote:
>
> > Lloyd Parsons wrote:
> > > In article <1147137690.095965.217410@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> > > "Reef Fish" wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Peter Berlin wrote:
> > > > > Yes, with all the spamming that Ray does, I am sure he is a millionaire
> > > > > by
> > > > > now. I guess the abuse is worth it, or it could be that that Ray is a
> > > > > pretty
> > > > > nice guy that doesn't ever bother anyone and just likes to post
> > > > > information
> > > > > be helpful. Yes, it could be.
> > > >
> > > > You know, all you pro-Ray posters are ignoring the fact that Ray's
> > > > ADs and SPAMs are VIOLATIONS of USENET Guidelines.
> > > >
> > > > All your seemingly clever arguments are fallacious.
> > > >
> > > > That speaks for the mentality of ALL of those who support Ray's ADs.
> > > >
> > > > -- Bob.
> > > >
> > > OK, Bob. You keep saying this, so where is the link to that exact
> > > usenet guideline?
> >
> > You are quite behind in your reading of my posts. Just look around
> > at ANY newsgroup and see why they are not AD-spammed openly
> > by somebody like Ray Goldenberg.
> >
> So you don't have a reference except anecdotal evidence, huh?
There's nothing anecdotal about what goes on in ALL newsgroups.
Can you give a reference that newsgroups should not be used
for personal emails between two people, such as you and Fred?
Is that why you did it?
>
> That means squat.
Everything means squat to you, Lloyd.
>
> >
> > > And if it is just a guideline, then I suppose we
> > > could say that some don't want to follow it. Then it is up to us in the
> > > newsgroup to either accept or reject those postings.
> >
> > You are actually right about this. It is NOT law. It is the
> > Guideline
> > honored by ALL newsgoups within USENET, except this one.
> >
> Nah, not by all. Probably not even the majority.
Name ONE newsgroup that has the semblance of a Ray Goldenberg
in ADs and SPAMs other than rec.travel.cruises!
> > > Since it seems you are nearly a minority of one in your decision, I
> > > would think that a reasonable person would then killfile the purported
> > > offender or just ignore it.
> >
> > Sorry, it doesn't work that way.
> >
> > I am hardly a minority of one. Ray and this newsgroup are a minority
> > of one among newsgroups and spammers within newsgroups.
> >
> Nope, you are a minority of one in THIS newsgroup.
You are WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, just as you're wrong about
everything else. I have read almost as many in THIS group who
expressed disgust over Ray's ad-posting as those brown-nosers
like yourself defending him in what's indefensible.
> > As of now, Ray has spammed this group 18005 times.
> >
> I consider it timely information.
>
> Your tirade on this subject is more spamlike.
No comment necessary against such self-indictment.
> > All time top posters
> > 18005 r...@lighthousetravel.com
> >
> > I have the right to PROTEST against Ray's ADs and SPAMS.
> >
> > I am at least 17,000 posts behind Ray's spams in this group.
> >
> > -- Bob.
-- Bob.
|