Lloyd Parsons wrote:
> > There's nothing anecdotal about what goes on in ALL newsgroups.
> >
> > Can you give a reference that newsgroups should not be used
> > for personal emails between two people, such as you and Fred?
> >
> > Is that why you did it?
>
> I did it 'cause it made sense. Feel free to post a link to those
> 'guidelines' you keep referring to.
You are DUMB. That was an example about what EVERYONE knows
not to do (to use newsgroup posting for private email chit chat), and
there
is no specific document needed for that netiquette.
> > > Nope, you are a minority of one in THIS newsgroup.
> >
> > You are WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, just as you're wrong about
> > everything else. I have read almost as many in THIS group who
> > expressed disgust over Ray's ad-posting as those brown-nosers
> > like yourself defending him in what's indefensible.
> >
> Bullshit, Bob. You can't count sock puppets you know.
Interesting classification. All protests against Ray are sockpuppets.
All posters spamming for Ray's spam are real members.
With a mind like that, who can argue with you? You would NEVER
understand any rational argument or statement of facts.
>
> >
> > > > As of now, Ray has spammed this group 18005 times.
> > > >
> > > I consider it timely information.
I consider it HARD information about the frequency of his spams!
> > >
> > > Your tirade on this subject is more spamlike.
> >
> > No comment necessary against such self-indictment.
> >
> >
> > > > All time top posters
> > > > 18005 r...@lighthousetravel.com
> > > >
> > > > I have the right to PROTEST against Ray's ADs and SPAMS.
> > > >
> > > > I am at least 17,000 posts behind Ray's spams in this group.
-- Bob.
|