George Leppla wrote:
> "Reef Fish" wrote
>
> > I think you are presumptious in your statement.
>
> Presumptious? Not really. Correct? Absolutely. Please take your foot out
> of your mouth long enough to read Jim's reply. You can apologize to me at
> any time.
Jim's reply? I was reply to YOU, George Leppla!
I was replying to George Leppla's post of May 15 2006 8:58 am
My post which you cited appeared at May 15 2006 12:40 pm
LONG before Jim's follow-up May 15 2006 6:31 pm
which I found in the thread just NOW.
Your lack of education, the inability to read, and laziness to look up
the post on which I made the "presumptious statement" was THIS:
Leppla> In this case, leaving off the name of the person who sent
Leppla> this to you did no good because anyone with a 2nd grade
Leppla> education who has read this newsgroup for more than
Leppla> three days knows who sent it to you.
You were presumptious in your last THREE LINES, on which I said
RF> I have a Ph.D. and I read this newsgroup for more than the
RF> past three days -- and I can say categorically that I DO NOT
RF> know who sent those to John.
to be responded by you only in your 2nd grade level insult:
Leppla> PhD = Piled Higher and Deeper. ( May 15 2006 3:20 pm)
> Geez... Jim says that John asked his permission to post that and Jim refused
> to give him permission. Jim wrote:
>
> "Permission was asked and I said no simply because I did
> not wish to get drawn in."
MY post appeared
LONG before Jim's follow-up May 15 2006 6:31 pm
which was hardly an hour ago! Mine appeared almost SIX hours ago.
Expect me to be clairvoyant to know what Jim will post 6 hours later?
George Leppla, learn to READ posts in their proper chronology.
You are a bigger moron than I had thought.
Leppla> Please take your foot out of your mouth long enough
Leppla> to read Jim's reply. You can apologize to me at any time.
All the feet are in YOUR mouth, George Leppla!
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Don't you think that John owes Jim an apology?
First of all, Jim will have to show the EVIDENCE that he told
John a MONTH before. In that case, it is quite possible
John had forgotten all about what Jim said. But it's up to
John to spaek for himself.
Don't you think you should apology for your wrong recollections of
FACTS in your preceding posts, your wrong accusations, and your
insulting remarks, to ME?
Are you Man enough to admit all your PROVEN errors?
>
> 2) Do you ever get tired of being wrong?
If I was wrong, you sure didn't find any evidence.
>
> --
> George Leppla http://www.countryside-travel.com
In spite of your repeated noise-making, errors, blunders, and
many posts we've exchanged, I STILL don't know WHO you
are, or who employed you, and I COULDN'T care less, just
like I don't know and don't care who "former CM empolyee"
(nor revealed to be Jim) IS or CARE who he is.
What I DO care are the FACTS of rights and wrongs!
I do know all the WRONGS Ray GOldenberg committed, not
the least of which was him inciting everyone to file FALSE
"Abuse" reports to Google about my posts.
The case is pending INVESTIGATION by Google. It wil take
time. There were over 10,000 ABUSE reports filed on
May 13 to Google -- three of them were by ME, two about
Ray's abuses, and all three are about my Large_Nassau_
Grouper@Yahoo.com account being blocked (pending
investigation), wanting Google to give the REASONS for
the blocking.
I don't blame Google for block first, ask questions later,
given the FALSE REPORTS Ray has been telling all his
pals like you to file to Google.
Did YOU, George Leppla file abuse reports to Google about
my posts? HOW MANY? How many did you file against
this Dr_Bob_Ling account, as Ray had instructed you to do?
George, given your lack of ability to READ and lack of
memory to know what post was in response to what, you
should keep your MOUTH SHUT to keep more feet from
entering it!
-- Dr. Bob. (aka Reef Fish).
|