"Reef Fish" wrote in message
news:1147927824.508988.236300@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Yes. The "Google Abuse" police, for the REAL ABUSE while he
> called for others to file FALSE abuse reports.
Funny, for all your whining, you're still posting, aren't you?
BTW, didn't you say you were "finished wasting your time with me"? Little
short term memory loss problem?
> Then your comprehension of the English language and the
> equivalent of unequivocal Court Evidence is severely lacking.
My comprehension is fine. The "circumstantial evidence" you claim shows
that George didn't lie. You were wrong. You owe him an apology.
> That's the number on May 13, 2006. You're just dying to know
> how aren't you? You're so ignorant. I won't tell you! LOL.
I personally don't care. You're the one whining and throwing that number
around like it's the vote in a popularity contest.
>> Then why have you been accusing Ray of orchestrating a conspiracy against
>> you? And who is Dick Goldenhaber? Or was it Ray Goldhaber?
>
> In the court of law, that's called "circumstantial evidence". Ray not
> only
> SOLICITATED false abuse reports, there was at least someone ELSE
> whom he quoted was passing the same solicitation.
No, it's called you accusing two people who don't exist of doing something.
In the court of law, that's called stupid.
> But Ray was the only one DUMB enough to be caught with the
> evidence that he PARTICIPATED and urged others to file false
> reports in the scheme he posted.
>
> VERY DUMB.
>
> BTW, did Ray get the permission of the author of the anonymous
> quote to post his quote?
>
> It's curious that your daddy Dick Goldhaber said he didn't know
> Ray, and then in a public post following-up on Ray's post,
> said "I did my part".
>
> Your dad Goldhaber also NEVER answered what he meant by
> "I did my part". Passing the solicitation note? Repeatedly
> pressed the ABUSE button for false reports, or something else?
Bob, contrary to what you may think about yourself, people don't have to
answer you. You're rude, obnoxious, and generally unfriendly. When someone
disagrees with you or expresses a different opinion, you only want to argue.
When that fails, you resort to childish name calling.
Maybe he typed that line because he knew it would get your drawers in a
knot? Looks like it did.
> You're WAY behind in your reading comprehension, logic, and the
> evidence of law.
Nope. You're the one who is accusing anything that moves of conspiracy and
lying.
> You have just proved my point. ALL of those posts were either on
> Ray Goldenberg's AD, such as
>
> RF< Ray Goldenberg wrote:
> RF> > Hi Everyone,
>
> RF> > I received this press release
>
> RF> Ray GoldenAd NOT.
>
> or on posts by others attacking me on my protest of Ray's ads.
>
> PAUL FALCE wrote:
>> GoldenAd Spammer wrote:
>> > Ray Goldenberg wrote:
>
>> >>Ray
>> >>SPAMHOUSE TRAVEL
>> >>800-777-9999 or 800-555-5555
>> >>http://www.spamhousetravel.com
>
>
> There was NOTHING in those posts about Ray's being
> on a cruise on Freedom of the Seas.
Yes, there was. I guess the fact that he talks about taking pictures while
he is on board escaped that superior reading comprehension of yours. Some
of the whirlpools for Sue. Some of the promenade for someone else. Let me
guess.....they didn't require you to read anything at Yale?
> That's in fact the whole point. Ray GOldenberg can be
> spamming there about his Travel Agency and his fans can
> be attacking me without anything relative to the Freedom
> of the Seas in that entire thread.
Nope. You hijacked the thread with SPAM. No one attacked you. They asked
you to stop SPAMMING the group.
> It was ALL about Ray's spamming of his Travel Agency.
Nope, at that point it was all about you.
> You FINALLY provided that tinyurl amongst all your drivels to
> PROVE yourself wrong, in more ways than you know.
Nope. It proved that you SPAMMED this newsgroup. It proved that you can't
read. And, despite that fact that the author of the charter and the keeper
of the charter have explained it to you, it proved that you can't admit when
you are wrong.
|