Then you better killfile me as you have Ray. Yet, it is indeed interesting
how some can change select words, along the original intent, and slant any
discussion just to their way of thinking. If killfiled, then some who feel
we have ruined what was once a decent newsgroup, can then move along, and
without finding it necessary to simply add fuel to the fire by responding
back to us.
It was said before, but this obviously needs repeating... I feel the
following statement by Jim pretty much sums up the demand of how I present
my information. Likewise, this was all discussed, in quite some detail, long
ago. If you weren't part of that discussion, and are obviously now on the
outside looking in, I have no reason or interest to even responds to such
comments. If you want reasons, go back and research this yourself. The
bottom line is, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
John Sisker
"I noticed that you have replied with this to all of Sisker's News Posts but
NONE of Goldenberg's? What is good for one is good for the other or does
this not apply to a favored member of your little clic?"
Jim
|