On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 06:21:09 -0500, Joseph Coulter
wrote:
>bigjim@backpacker.com wrote in news:1155813260.062236.7730
>@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
>
>> The USS Cole, embassies in nairobi, etc, world trade center (1st time)
>>
>Even George bush isn't ready to declare war on all Muslims. the problme
>with the things listed is that they were individual actions for which
>there is no good court remedy. Yes, Bush did decdie that Afghastan
>should benefit from Freedom building (and they are still mired in it
>just not getting the headlines) then he remembered Saddam H. and
>wouldn't let the truth get in the way of invasion. What does one have to
>do with the other?
>Saddam ordered the Cole now?
>
>Yes, we are at "war" but it is not a stand upand fight war. It is a war
>that armies can't fight. The more we shoot the "enemy" the better
>recruitment goes for the terrorist cause.
Terrorist acts should be handled by police action just as the UK plot
was. Calling something a war doesn't mean you actually have to invade
other countries with your armed forces.
Who would we invade to win the War on Poverty?
Thumper |