wrote in message
news:535ie2d6s0qf35ugh018pe0on0fh41du6p@4ax.com...
> It's all for security, have you not heard? There is no sacrifice too
> great to feel more secure, right? If a few people die because their
> medicines or life support equipment get lost or they go blind because
> their eye drops were confiscated, well, that's the minor price you pay
> to live in a free society. It says we are free, right ont he label, I
> am sure of it.
>
> At least one major court has ruled that flying is a privilege not a
> right (in a case regarding having to produce acceptable I.D. in order
> to fly even though your bags and person are thoroughly searched) and
> since there are buses and trains and even bicycles, you have a choice,
> so not being abkle to fly does not limit your freedom to travel in any
> way. They never have explained how you are expected to travel
> overseas in an era with no real point-to-point passenger ships, but no
> matter, it's all for safety and as endless quotes from other people
> indicate: "You just can't be too safe and no price is to high to feel
> safer when travelling and they know things we don't so we should all
> obey the rules, it's for our own good." I guess you can sell your
> house and buy a sailboat large enough to take you where you need to go
> if overseas and learn how to survive while doing it.
>
> Jim P.
>
> The Pres. has gone on record as saying that only those who wish to do
> harm will be bothered by these rules and the innocent have no reason
> to worry when their goods are searched or confiscated. I sure feel
> safer.
Sheesh, Jim, who wound YOU up? Enough is enough already!
--Jean
|
