In article <1167181374.819111.126110@48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com>, Greg
wrote:
> My take is that RC simply made a bad decision. It seems to me that they
> should have simply written off Belize and stayed on the rest of the
> original itinerary. That way there would have been no other impact to
> the shore excursions. It is not as if there were not other and better
> alternatives to what was chosen.
Sounds simple but I have read there was not enough fuel left to stay on
the rest of the original itinerary. They burned too much fuel having to
return to Miami to continue that itinerary. So it was not a poor
decision. It was the best decision. As they are in your words "a
professionally run, premier cruise line" they have more information and
facts than your speculation as to what they could have done.
--
Charles |
