In article <5kdcffF2tck1U1@mid.individual.net>,
Becca wrote:
> Kurt Ullman wrote:
>
> > In this case you have less of a leg to stand on. Unlike restaraunts
> > and workplaces, this is a private company doing this solely because they
> > want to, for whatever reason. No government mandates or requirement.
>
> The non-smokers have greatly outnumbered the smokers, that is the only
> reason the cruise lines would consider making these changes. That is
> just my opinion, I could be wrong.
>
> Becca
Spot on, Becca.
Besides the fire hazard potential, smoking makes for more work for the
cleaning crews. You can bet that was part of the decision making
process as that involves money.
It will be interesting to see how this all plays out. |