John Sisker wrote:
> Thanks so much for the complement. However, I'm a bit surprised that the
> typical bashing hasn't started yet in this reference from the hypocrites of
> the high seas; but maybe with this "When in a cruise:" series, they finally
> see the benefit of trying to help, instead of finding fault with one
> another. In any event, thanks!
>
> "E Fitzgerald" wrote in message
> news:477699c6$0$9591$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> Thank you John for another interesting post in the "When on a cruise:"
>> series, I hope to see more of this type of post. If TA's must be allowed
>> to post here, this is the type of information they should be giving, and
>> not whether the shipboard hair salons are making a profit.
You're welcome. Though relatively new to this NG, I am surprised and I
find it a little hypocritical that some TA's can post all the irrelevant
spam they want, while others are castigated for posting similar items.
Particularly annoying are the posts regarding financials of various
cruise companies and associated businesses. I'm aware that many
cruisers own stock in their favorite cruise lines. But, I also believe
that one cannot serve two masters--i.e. the customers and the
stockholders. What benefits the stockholders most is likely to benefit
the customers least.
FWIW
EF |