On Mar 26, 11:20=EF=BF=BDpm, "Tom K" wrote:
> "sue mullen" wrote in message
>
> news:650j09F2e0psoU1@mid.individual.net...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Tom K wrote:
> >> "seauonboard" wrote in message
> >>news:967c140a68e31591eaf24a113be069db@localhost.talkabouttravelling.com.=
..
> >>> I think this a horrible trade off. =EF=BF=BDThey could have come up wi=
th
> >>> something
> >>> better for such a great ship.
>
> >> It's actually not a very highly rated ship.
>
> > Other then the smoke problems, everything on the Conquest was very good.=
> > Excellant food and service and wonderful deli station and oriental
> > stations in the buffet.
>
> > sue
>
> Berlitz rates it below all Celebrity ships, all HAL ships, all Princess
> ships, both Disney ships, almost all RCI ships (except the
> Monarch/Majesty/Sovereign), the new NCL ships like Dawn, and a number of
> "one off" ships like Oriana, Aurora and QM2 (within the large ship
> category).
>
> That would seem to leave it somewhat short of "great".
>
> --Tom- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
We had a cruise about three or four weeks ago on Conquest. I thought
the ship was lovely, really liked the Impressionist theme throughout
the ship. Found nothing to complain about, the ship and the cruise
were great in my book.
Rosie |
