National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]




Re: OT... now top vs. bottom posting Posted on: 5 Apr 2008 13:58:28 -0700

In article , Boomer says...
>
>Me neither.

(Dislikes "scrolling")

Get over yourself. And learn some manners.
-------------------------------------------


A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting.
Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

This ain't Jeopardy - the answers go *after* the questions.

----------

A: Because it reverses the logic of a conversation....
Q: Why shouldn't I top post?

----------

One explanation at
http://www.river.com/users/share/etiquette/#inline

----------

A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

----------

Dave: Oh! Now it makes sense to me. Okay! No more top-posting for me!
Bob: It's annoying because it reverses the normal order of conversation.
In fact, many people ignore top-posted articles.
Dave: What's so wrong with that?
Bob: That's posting your response *before* the article you're quoting.
Dave: People keep bugging me about "top-posting." What does that mean?

----------

A: Top posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?