On 1/10/2009 9:23 PM, frijoli wrote:
> John Sisker wrote:
>> There are a lot of off-topic subjects being posted on this newsgroup,
>> but technically, this was not one of them. Here is the actual (and
>> unmodified) press release in question to show that in spite of what a
>> few others are trying to claim, it does say (and I quote) "... It also
>> includes the Disney Cruise Line; Disney Vacation Club; Adventures by
>> Disney;..." Just see for yourself:
>> http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=200600&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1242573&highlight.
>>
>> Therefore, in spite of the name calling and made up labels, the facts
>> are here.
>>
>> Happy sailing...
>> John Sisker - SHIP-TO-SHORE CRUISE AGENCY®
>> (714) 536-3850 or toll-free at (800) 724-6644 & (Agency ID: 714.536.3850)
>> www.shiptoshorecruise.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> I will probably regret getting involved here but I agree that this
>>> post was off-topic and did not belong here (and I do not generally
>>> care about most of your posts). The press release said nothing about
>>> them doing this on Disney cruise line ships, it was for their
>>> parks/resorts only. The title says so, I don't see how you can even
>>> argue the fact.
>>>
>>> Bill
>>
> nuff said
No, not "nuff" said.
To answer the question in your earlier post, yes, I did read the
original post, And the only place where the word "cruise" is
present is where it tells you what the parent company owns. If
the post had said that they were going to install them on the
cruise ships after this first one, then maybe it would make
sense. As it is, it has as much place being here (and is about
as relevant) as a post telling us a review of a new Disney movie
or a press release about a new ABC (also owned by Disney)
television show.
Bill |