"Doesn't Frequently Mop"
wrote in message news:5qngl39ve539hm1m0f29774o7e98jd8tu8@4ax.com...
> >> I think that cigarettes should be banned, because they have no
> >> benefits, and numerous risks.
> >
> >Really? Non smokers would have to pay more tax if they were banned,
> >since cigarette tax vastly outweighs the cost of treating smoking
> >related diseases (in the UK at least), and they save money in
> >pensions, treating age related diseases etc as smokers die younger.
> >
> >So there's a couple of benefits.
>
> That's one benefit, not two.
Ah ha! You are arithmetically challenged!
Hint: the "and" separates the two benefits.
> Here, let me give you a starting point. Please read it before going
> any further:
> http://gea2000.org/tobacco/wb/wb03.shtml
What a wittering load of twaddle. No actual numbers.
> >I guess some people want to ban tourism, as travel produces CO2 and
> >they don't see any benefits. But some people are closed minded like
> >that.
> >
> >> I'm guessing a cogent response won't come to this.
> >
> >Tough. You've got 2.
>
> Nothing you have offered has been convincing nor believable,
> considering it's based for the most part on fantasy.
This from the person who says he "PMSL" at the idea that most people
in the UK support hanging!
Do you get nice sunsets on your planet?
--
Andy
|