On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:05:34 +0000, Mike.......
wrote:
>Following up to john_kulp@... (John Kulp) wrote:
>
>>If it is not arbitrary, then, it is policy and everyone can be
>>expected to be treated exactly the same. They aren't, as the article
>>said. What was the careful consideration? They first said no, then,
>>too late, they said yes. Is that intelligent? If the are not
>>faceless, why was no health official that made this decision quoted
>>then or come forth? Sure, your politicians discuss it, and I would
>>guess that now publicized, this case will be widely discussed as it
>>should be, but they are not the health officials making it. They,
>>most probably, will be running for cover.
>
>I dont think your original phrase including dumb was appropriate to
>the situation.
>--
>Mike
>Remove clothing to email
That's a matter of opinion I suppose. You can go look at the petition
for her online and see what a fair number of your fellow Brits think,
assuming you are a Brit |