On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:14:25 +0100, Tim C.
wrote:
>>What's the leap then? No one here has provided one iota of proof that
>>this didn't happen to her. There is an online petition mostly signed
>>by Brits supporting her with her response. The rule apparently is
>>that whoever is able (I won't say responsible but I haven't seen
>>anyone stepping up claiming responsibility for it--I wonder why) to
>>make decisions like this can, in fact, make them and impose them
>>against a patient's own doctor's views, against clear market practice
>>where the same drug is routinely used in many other countries and all
>>the rest. And all of this without apparently much, if any, recourse
>>on the decision. So, instead of blather like this, why don't you try
>>to address all that? Because you can't?
>
>I don't doubt for one minute that what the NYT says happened to the
>women is true - more or less. But it has absolutely no relevance or
>logical connection to the fact that a such a rule exists or not.
>Do we have to do all your thinking for you? Can't you get your family
>involved.
You can't even do your own thinking much less mine. If there is not
some rule/policy allowing decisions like this to be made, how was it
then made? Where did they get the authority to do it? |