William Black wrote:
> "dgs" wrote in message
> news:6502ecF2chd6sU1@mid.individual.net...
>
>>William Black wrote:
>>
>>>"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
>>>news:gc67u3dgf37lhu1de7b250a8i6d6ilvr9b@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>William Black writes:
>>>>
>>>>>The type that considers hiking shorts and boots acceptable dress for one
>>>>>of
>>>>>the most sophisticated cities on earth...
>>>>
>>>>Companies that place an emphasis on dress tend not to be very successful.
>>>
>>>
>>>Like IBM, General Motors, the Ford Motor Company, all the oil
>>>companies, GKN, British Aerospace, Boeing, RTZ and on, and on, and
>>>on...
>>
>>Boeing doesn't put an emphasis on dress any more, and hasn't done so for
>>years. And Microsoft never has.
>
> Who mentioned Micro$oft?
I did. Might as well have an example of a successful company that
hasn't bothered with a dress code, too.
OTOH, I can think of numerous companies that were utter failures, even
though none of them had dress codes. It's a funny old world, innit?
> Now IBM...
Once did, no longer does, hasn't in many cases for quite some time.
Point is, Anthony's useless little statement about correlating companies
and their dress codes with success is a complete non-sequitur, as is
typical for the poor deluded twit. |