On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:42:00 +0100, Tim C. wrote:
>On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:33:23 GMT, john_kulp@hotmail.com (John Kulp)
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:54:38 +0100, Tim C.
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:39:13 GMT, john_kulp@hotmail.com (John Kulp)
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:58:22 +0000, Mike...
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Following up to erilar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>The latter, yes, but 9/11 was not a US act.
>>>>>
>>>>>One of Obamas aids seems to think it was "chickens coming home to
>>>>>roost", I can see his point and also the poor security pre 9/11, which
>>>>>you could characterise as "US .up".
>>>>
>>>>Then what was the bombing in London?
>>>
>>>Also a . up. You point is?
>>
>>My point is you know nothing about security. There is no perfect
>>system as we learned long ago in Vietnam.
>
>The lesson was taught, but not much was learnt, it seems.
Agent Orange hasn't been used in Iraq to defoliate the jungle.
--
Martin
|