Magda wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:01:48 GMT, in rec.travel.europe, john_kulp@hotmail.com (John Kulp)
> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
>
> ... On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:04:51 +0100, Mxsmanic
> ... wrote:
> ...
> ... >EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) writes:
> ... >
> ... >> Especially not "Esperanto", which was designed to be a "universal"
> ... >> language, but never really caught on!
> ... >
> ... >It has no culture to support it.
> ...
> ... But was used by the US military to test language learning ability
>
> Real languages would have been jealous had one of them been chosen instead?
Why teach something practical, when you can use a language with no
native-speakers at all?
>
>
> =====
> It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does. |