On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:29:16 GMT, in rec.travel.europe, john_kulp@hotmail.com (John Kulp)
arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
... On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:22:17 +0200, Martin wrote:
... >> ...
... >> ... Sometimes the vulgar form fits too well to resist. If you prefer: I am
... >> ... repelled by societies where the role of women is to always defer to men,
... >> ... even if they are beaten bloody by them, forced to hide under black
... >> ... sacks, walk three paces behind, have no thoughts of their own. . . do
... >> ... you want it longer?
... >>
... >>Did you forget clitoris excision or did you leave it out on purpose to spare Kulp's
... >>delicate sensibilities?
... >
... >I think you could have phrased that better.
"Better", how? Clearer? Less explicit? Maybe use poetry to disguise a crime against half
of humanity?
... No, it fits her level exactly.
I'm going to agree with the majority over here and admit that you are just an
insignificant, yapping little bitch.
=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does. |