National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




Subject: Re: filtering Posted on: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:23:53 EDT

grusl wrote on Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:27:53 +0530:


g> "David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)"
g> wrote in message
news:1ietf97.1fa59mq1okiynkN%d4g4h4@yahoo.co.uk...
??>> Martin wrote:
??>>
??>>> On another group somebody suggested deleting spam by
??>>> filtering out any post with a .com or .net address from
??>>> newsgroups. Can it really be that easy? It seems to work
??>>> with the current examples of spam.
??>>
??>> I think you'd have to whitelist a lot more people than if
??>> you filtered out google groups. A lot of posters here use
??>> .net I think. The ISP filtering method suggested is
??>> probably the best I think- though I can't actually do that
??>> with the reader I use...
??>>
g> Even whitelisting seems to be beyond OE's limited scope as a
g> newsreader.

Not quite true if "whitelisting" means putting on a list of
those to be expected. It is necessary to end the rule with Stop
processing more rules.


James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

E-mail, with obvious alterations:
not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not