On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:55:53 -0700, Hatunen wrote:
>On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:20:07 GMT, john_kulp@hotmail.com (John
>Kulp) wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:01:31 -0700, Hatunen wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:22:06 GMT, john_kulp@hotmail.com (John
>>>Kulp) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Yet more babble from the airhead
>>>
>>>Yet again Kulp displays his disdain for posting anything of even
>>>reasonable intelligence.
>>
>>I've posted at least as much of it as you ever have.
>
>I'm not into having a pissing contest here, although apparently
>you are. But I wonder how the total of your cogent posts compare
>to the total of your inane responses. I have plonked Magda; I
>would regret plonking you, but if your cogent posts need be
>sacrificed to get rid of your inane posts, I would consider it.
>
>Your cogent posts, which I admittedly frequently disagree with,
>have misled me into into thinking you to be above the sort of
>things you seem inclined to shoot off, and it's not responses to
>only Magda. Indeed, you seem a bit schizophrenic in that regard.
Let me be clear. I do not like liars, distorters and the like. In my
experience, they do it because they are not called on it, which is why
I call them on it without hesitation. So that is why I will go after
them. There may have been one, but I can't recall a single post of
hers that added anything to any conversation being conducted. I have
no problem with a decent discussion whether someone disagrees or
agrees with me. That is what discussions are for. You can call it
childish or whatever and it may be, but the purpose is to point out
just what someone like her is doing. |
