EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote:
> David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*) wrote:
> > Mike........ wrote:
> >
> >> Following up to d4g4h4@yahoo.co.ukDavid Horne, _the_ chancellor
> >>
> >>> Of course, but no one here suggested having to accept anything because
> >>> they were told it was good. You're introducing a red herring here.
> >> its an element of the defewrence art is given.
> >
> > By whom? Not by me. I try and keep this based on my own opinions, and
> > civil, and then posters like Tim throw all this crap around. I'm out of
> > it now. If you like the copies as much as the originals, fine.
>
> Well, at least copies allow many people to "see" works which they will
> never have the opportunity to see in the original. Are you saying
> that's a BAD thing?
No, and I never said such a thing. If you'd read my posts in the thread
properly, you wouldn't have asked the question.
--
(*) of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate -www.davidhorne.net
(email address on website) "If people think God is interesting, the
onus is on them to show that there is anything there to talk about.
Otherwise they should just shut up about it." -Richard Dawkins |