"erilar" wrote in message
news:drache-D4AB97.16395508042008@news.airstreamcomm.net...
> In article <1nk2t1xawdcat.1j5c3359f9cnb$.dlg@40tude.net>,
> "Mike....." wrote:
>
>> Following up to Roland Perry
>>
>> > I upgraded to another $1000 2MP
>> > 1600*1200 SLR-style digital camera. Imagine my surprise a couple of
>> > years later when my phone came with a "free" 2MP 1632*1224 camera built
>> > in. Not so good in low light, though.
>>
>> people get hung up on megapixels, thats only the "film". Have a look at
>> the
>> lens on an SLR and the lens on a phone and guess which one gets better
>> shots!
>
> People do tend to forget about the lens in these megapixel days, don't
> they? 8-)
>
Tell me about it.
I'm looking for a new camera at the moment.
Right now my researches tell me a 7 meg camera with a decent lens produces
better results than a 12 meg one with a rubbish lens.
But they (Kodak) don't do the nice lens with the big CCD for reasons people
don't seem to want to talk about...
--
William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.
|