In article ,
Roland Perry wrote:
> In message , at
> 18:52:30 on Tue, 8 Apr 2008, poldy remarked:
> >Why not use a regular camera?
>
> I've already covered that a couple of times: it's yet another thing to
> carry around. I've already got a phone, a laptop and power supply (with
> various foreign plugs), 3G modem and other bits and pieces, plus all my
> papers. Perhaps if there was an obvious camera I could buy that was
> about $50, the size of a mobile phone (or smaller) and took pictures
> that were noticeably better[1], I might carry it [2] around.
>
> [1] I did try this idea once, but the pictures were *worse*.
> [2] And the inevitable battery charger.
I don't know about price, but there are some very small digital cameras.
None of the things you carry need a battery charger?
--
Mary Loomer Oliver (aka Erilar)
You can't reason with someone whose first line of argument is
that reason doesn't count. --Isaac Asimov
Erilar's Cave Annex: http://www.chibardun.net/~erilarlo
|