On Jun 7, 2:01=A0pm, good...@rock.com wrote:
> Everyone needs .ual fulfillment at least from age 14 on. =A0When they
> do not get positive .ual fulfillment, they may turn to perversions:
> boots, dominance and submission, bestiality, fisting, scat,
> pedophilia, necrophilia, whatever.
>
> Truly .ual and loving relationships are fulfilling. =A0Everyone needs
> to be .ually fulfilled. =A0If this means doing 10 chicks, this means
> doing 10 chicks. =A0When they lack .ual fulfillment because they a) do
> not get enough lustful ., or b) do not get . with enough people,
> or c) do not get enough love, which helps make . good, - when they
> are .ually unfulfilled, they may turn to perversions. =A0If they are
> not .ually unfulfilled, the possibility that they may turn to
> perversions is slim.
>
> Not that I mean to condemn perversions or speak about them in a
> derogatory sense. =A0In my mind there's nothing wrong with anything
> .ual, so long as it's not destructive or dangerous. =A0So long as it's
> safe, it may be something to try. =A0Maybe it would be fun. Apparently
> some people on this board view perversions in a derogatory sense
> however, so I thought I would make the point that there is little
> impetus for perversion for people who are being .ually fulfilled.
>
> Like whatever turns you on is a fine thing if it's not destructive.
> But there is little else to pursue if you're having plenty of good .
> with people you find .ually attractive. =A0I would imagine perverts
> generally don't.
>
> So, . is positive, good, and necessary for a completely happy and
> healthy life.
>
> As the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America
> states:
>
> We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
> equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
> Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty AND THE PURSUIT OF
> HAPPINESS.
>
> Just remember to use birth control. =A0Two types at once if possible.
> Taking a risk with an unborn baby is an evil. =A0Two forms of birth
> control is safer than a vasectomy or a tubal ligation.
>
> I would recommend condoms and the pull-out method for guys. =A0Condoms,
> and hormonal birth control or a barrier method such as a diaphragm for
> girls. =A0Once the guys trusts the girl's on hormonal or is using a
> barrier method, and if both choose less protection against STD's,
> hormonal or barrier method, and pull-out method would be an option.
> As would hormonal and a barrier method with no pull-out, but that
> leaves it all up to the girl.
>
> Besides, keeping ejaculation out of orifices is the best way to
> protect against pregnancy and =A0several STD's. =A0Especially if there are=
> any cuts or lesions. =A0So pull-out or condoms is probably a plan most
> of the time. =A0If a girl's on the pill maybe you want to cum in a her a
> few times and she'll want you more. =A0Another alternative to pulling
> out could be to screw without a condom, take your dick out, and then
> put a condom on before you cum.
>
> Remember that some of these 4 methods are not very safe when used
> alone by themselves. =A0For instance if you use just the pull-out
> method, or even just the diaphragm or condom by itself you are not
> protecting yourself alot against pregnancy... =A01 in 333 people per
> year seriously do get pregnant while on the pill. =A0Combine that with
> the pull out method, and the risk falls to 1 in 832,500. =A0I know that
> sounds like a large number, but it's true.
Yessssss...
scRunge was "conceived" via the "pull- out" method...
Which is why he is literally "one in a million"...
;-D
--
Best
Greg |