National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




Subject: Re: United Air to charge obese double on full flights Posted on: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:04:39 +1000

Robyn Kingsize wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, "Alohacyberian" wrote:
>> "Pugh" wrote in message
>> news:20090415233237.A51664E4A7@poisonous.dizum.com...
>>> http://uk.reuters.com/article/tnBasicIndustries-SP/idUKN1552136120090415
>>>
>>> United Air to charge obese double on full flights
>>>
>>> Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:26pm BST
>>> LOS ANGELES, April 15 (Reuters) - United Airlines, a unit of UAL
>>> Corp (UAUA.O: Quote, Profile, Research), will require obese
>>> passengers bumped from full flights to purchase two seats on a
>>> subsequent flight, matching the policy of some other carriers.
>>>
>>> The change brings the Chicago-based in line with eight other
>>> airlines including Continental, Delta, JetBlue and Southwest,
>>> United spokeswoman Robin Urbanski said on Wednesday.
>>>
>>> "Last year we had 700 complaints from passengers who had to share
>>> their seats," she said.
>>>
>>> Under the new policy, obese passengers -- defined as unable to
>>> lower the arm rest and buckle a seat belt with one extension belt
>>> -- will still be reaccommodated, at no extra charge, to two empty
>>> seats if there is space available.
>>>
>>> If, however, the airplane is full, they will be bumped from the
>>> flight and may have to purchase a second ticket, at the same price
>>> as the original fare, Urbanski said.
>>>
>>> If the bumped passenger chooses to cancel the trip, the ticket will
>>> be refunded with no additional charge.
>>>
>>> The policy is effective immediately. (Reporting by Deena Beasley;
>>> Editing by Richard Chang)
>>>
>>
>> Wonderful! The question remains, will the lard asses get the
>> message and lose some weight to prolong their own lives? Unlikely.
>> More likely they'll throw their weight around and demand that the
>> rest of us realize that the fatsos have the right to increase
>> everyone else's health coverage to accommodate the excesses of their
>> inability to keep their mouths shut. KM

> Fat people don't live shorter lives due to fat, it's due to poor medical care.

Wrong.

> A fat person will go to a doctor with cancer and is
> told to lose weight. A thin person gets treatment.

The fat person gets diabetes a lot more often than the thin people do.

And that has a significant effect on lifespan, even with the best medical treatment.

> Given equal medical treatment, a fat person will live longer than a thin person.

Easy to claim, hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.

> You should read the book 'The Fatter, The Better' .

No thanks, its just another steaming turd.

> It has dozens of studies that prove you'll want your BMI over 45 for maximum life expectancy.

Pity about the increased risk of diabetes.


1047117. Re: Adventure Vacation Yawn 1047117
1047118. Re: HAPPY EASTER! 1047118
1047119. Re: life after Windows.... 1047119
1047120. Re: Top scenic drives in Europe? 1047120
1047121. Re: Top scenic drives in Europe? 1047121
1047129. =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Allemagne_=2D_Belgique_Avril_2009_Photos_de_Voyage_Pay
1047148. Re: HAPPY EASTER! 1047148
1047149. Wholesale Coogi,ED Hardy hip hop clothing (www.Look4Clothing.com) 10
1047150. Re: HAPPY EASTER! 1047150
1047151. Cheap Hotel 1047151
1047152. Re: HAPPY EASTER! 1047152
1047153. Re: Best Resource For Planning/Booking Budget Family Holiday In 104
1047154. Re: Top scenic drives in Europe? 1047154
1047155. sell eve isk 1047155
1047156. Re: best place to procure a good walking map of London at LHR 104715
1047157. French motorists finally lose regional differences 1047157
1047158. =?UTF-8?B?4pWr4paI4pWr4oCi4pa6S2F0ZSB3aW5zbGV0IGhvdCBib29iIHNxdWVleiA
1047159. Test message 1047159
1047160. Re: Test message 1047160
1047161. Re: Test message 1047161