On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:17:31 +0100, Dave Frightens Me
wrote:
>On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:51:04 +0000,
>this_address_is_for_spam@yahoo.co.uk (David Horne, _the_ chancellor of
>the royal duchy of city south and deansgate) wrote:
>
>>Dave Frightens Me wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:27:35 +0000,
>>> this_address_is_for_spam@yahoo.co.uk (David Horne, _the_ chancellor =
of
>>> the royal duchy of city south and deansgate) wrote:
>>>=20
>>> >Dave Frightens Me wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:59:33 +0000,
>>> >> this_address_is_for_spam@yahoo.co.uk (David Horne, _the_ =
chancellor of
>>> >> the royal duchy of city south and deansgate) wrote:
>>> >[]
>>> >> >Some US states have laws which ban smoking within a certain =
distance of
>>> >> >an entrance. It seems to work there IME. A lot of it is design =
related I
>>> >> >suppose, but I find it a real problem at the entrance to UK =
shopping
>>> >> >centres.
>>> >>=20
>>> >> It can't be too hard or expensive to make a smoke detector that =
just
>>> >> creates an irritating sound when a smoker stands near a doorway. =
Just
>>> >> enough to make them move away a little.
>>> >
>>> >That would annoy other people passing by though.
>>>=20
>>> Uh... only if they're smoking too!
>>
>>So non-smokers standing by that doorway or people passing by won't hear
>>the annoying sound aimed at smokers standing there? Wow- that's a nifty
>>piece of equipment! :)
>
>It'd also sound if your characters exceed eighty.
and his age, sometimes. :)
--=20
Martin
|