On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:51:22 -0000, Yitzhak "Yitzy-yatzi-I'm-A-Nazi" Goldstein
wrote:
Peace be to all readers of my words, which I find a matter of duty, in
confronting some residual Nazism which still exists in AADP.
Before I begin let me post a few of Nazi Coughlan's comments
which recognize his support for Hitler and the Nazi party. You
will notice that he feels these posts are both in impeccably correct
grammar and reflect his strong feelings in AADP. You also
not be able to find any denial of his feelings in respect to his
words, as he stands fierce and proud of his support for Nazi
doctrine --
"The Holocaust was 'a just execution for those found guilty of being
Jewish'." -- Desmond Coughlan. See --
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.activism.death-penalty/msg/9e47adb28f22faaf
"The issue is whether or not, the Nazis, in declaring Jews 'inhuman',
were acting illegally. They were not." -- Desmond Coughlan. See --
http://groups.google.fr/group/alt.activism.death-penalty/msg/8fcc1c8e5cb0f3d3
"Are we to accept the word of a committee, bent on revenge, which in
itself violated the human rights of the Nazis ?"-- Desmond Coughlan. See --
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.activism.death-penalty/msg/944deb89e3e1b631
"In the absolute, the Nazi Holocaust and the death penalty are
perfect equivalents, both morally and legally." -- Desmond Coughlan. See --
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.activism.death-penalty/msg/09343f66a6cea661
"Auschwitz wouldn't execute a 72-year-old man..." -- Desmond Coughlan. See --
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.activism.death-penalty/msg/2e39751aaf992176
"'The Holocaust' is a term used to refer to the legal execution of
6,000,000 Jews in the Second World War."
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.activism.death-penalty/msg/88e428e1da2cf26f
"yet by milking those terrible events [the Holocaust] for all they are
worth, 60 years later, Israel and World Jewry are only cutting their
noses, to spite their face." -- Desmond Coughlan. See --
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism.death-penalty/msg/c2ef9625017cc935
Further it must be noted that Nazi Coughlan insists that it is not an insult for
him to demand that the Jewish victims of the Holocaust were guilty. See --
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism.death-penalty/msg/213a43adb0f0fc0b
To which Nazi Coughlan replied that he did not consider it an insult.
But then insisted in one of the most raving supports for a murderer ever
posted to AADP, that it is an insult for anyone to even imply that Roger
Coleman was guilty. See --
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism.death-penalty/msg/60893d542836b408
If only Nazi Coughlan had EVER argued as forcefully for the innocence of
the Jews, as he did for the "innocence" (sic) of Roger Coleman. But that
would mean that the Jewish victims of the Holocaust meant that much to
him as Roger Coleman, and all regular readers in AADP know that isn't
the way Nazi Coughlan's mind works.
>James 'pro-Jewish and proud of it' Noles wrote:
>
>{ snip 200 lines of atrociously formatted and borderline unreadable
> rhetoric }
TRANSLATION: "That .ing PV did it to me, AGAIN!!!"
>>> WTF has desmond to do with this, Jim?
>
>> Huh??? Look at the top. You responded to a comment from
>> Desmond, which Desmond had disagreed with you, essentially
>> agreeing with me, even with his lies about being Jewish.
>> Obviously he was part of this with his comment.
>
>The above proves (yet again) that you are unable to separate real
>life and Usenet, NN.
>
>I do not 'agree' or 'disagree' with anyone outside of this group. I
>rip you to shreds here on AADP, because your neo-fascist and
>revisionist views deserve it (IMHO). Likewise, when I 'attack'
>Donna or Q. or John, it's on AADP only.
>
I understand... it was all just false rhetoric when you talked about
reading Jewish journals, and noted that "Arabs" were "calling for
the destruction of Israel, or for every Jew to be killed." In your
words that you now retract of -- " _L'Arche_ has a very good
section every month, detailing the latest articles and documentaries
which have appeared in the Arab and/or Islamic press and on television,
calling for the destruction of Israel, or for every Jew to be
killed, etc."
>You, on the other hand, have mental problems bordering on paranoid
>schizophrenia, and you see every word against you here on AADP as
>an attack by 'the gang'. When you make a grammatical or spelling
>.-up, rather than admitting that you didn't know, you spend
>hours scouring google to find similar examples, and present them
>as 'proof' that your error is, in fact, the correct way to write
>something.
My... my... look at the froth forming on your lips. Your face looks
like a German beer just after having been drawn.
> You know that 'if' is a conjunction and not a
>'conditional clause', for since our last exchange on that subject,
>you've checked the meaning of 'clause' in _The OED_, and you now
>know that a clause requires a subject and a verb. 'if' _cannot_
>be a conditional clause.
This is just too delicious. I need to savor this moment. See --
http://home.earthlink.net/~onetimeuse/if.html
For something that you claim "_cannot_ be" you happen to be
calling the OED a reference that is meaningless.
> You know it, but you'll never admit to it.
Why would I call the OED meaningless? See --
http://home.earthlink.net/~onetimeuse/if.html
> And the more I demonstrate your monstrous ignorance, the angrier
>you get, and the more I make a point of checking the brake lines on
>my 'cycle' (sic). You're a sad loser, NN.
Heh... Yeah, Nazi Coughlan... claim I'm angry because I've pinned
you up like Jesus on the Cross. See --
http://home.earthlink.net/~onetimeuse/if.html
/quote/ A.1.a. Conditional clause in pres. (or pres. perf.) ind.;
How sweet it is to watch you try to use one of your dipshit gimmicks.
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dipshit_Gimmicks/gimmick_18.html
>That's why you do not ever win. That's why you cannot ever win.
Yada... yada... yada...
Game, set, and match to the Oxford English Dictionary, Revision 3.0.
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
>Y.
>
>--
> Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
> AADP's 'left-wing Jewish intellectual'
Heh.. heh... You're neither Jewish nor an intellect, silly boy. See [1]
> * http://jewish-and-proud-of-it.blogspot.com/
http://home.earthlink.net/~onetimeuse/Coughlan-is-a-lying-scumbag.blogspot.html
> * See Jim Noles get comprehensively hammered over his idiotic
> belief that 'kippa' is not a Hebrew word, and 'yarmulke' is not
> a Yiddish word: http://minilien.fr/a0juqb
See my destruction of Desmond Coughlan's comment -
http://tinyurl.com/qf8yv
Of course, "kippa" is not a Hebrew word. That's too .ing
absurd to even do anything but laugh at. The French do not
decide what words are Hebrew and what words are not Hebrew.
The French looked at that HEBREW WORD, and from that
HEBREW WORD created a French word from the sound of
that Hebrew word.... created the French word "kippa"...
to symbolize the SENSE of that HEBREW WORD. The
etymological SENSE... but not the FORM. The Hebrew word
remains in the FORM of the Hebrew language....this word --
http://tinyurl.com/esrl7
TO claim that the FORM of "kippa" is the same FORM as
http://tinyurl.com/esrl7
is a form of fanatical intellectual blindness. The belief that the
French have the right to change the Hebrew language to suit
themselves. Obviously the Hebrew word
http://tinyurl.com/esrl7
is not French... so conversely the French cannot make "kippa"
become Hebrew. Although this is the claim from Nazi Coughlan.
While Nazi Coughlan is again lying, since I have never
said that "Yarmolke" is not a Yiddish word. In fact, some time
ago, I put up a web page taken from the Oxford English Dictionary,
which states that very fact, thus I was the one having insisted it
was valid, while yitzi-nazi argued that the OED, _sucked big
time_, because he wanted it to. See --
http://home.earthlink.net/~onetimeuse/yarmulke1.jpg
Then watch NC go into psychotic convulsions watching me
forcible taking out every bit of blood and bone in his argument.
The poor man is so delusional that he believes the French have
been blessed by God to not only turn wine into water, but to
change Hebrew into French, so the French will more readily be
able to dismiss the Jews as meaningful, or Hebrew as having
any validity among all members of our species. The man is so
delusional, so fixated upon France as some sort of religious
symbol in his life, that he considers whatever France decides
to do with the Hebrew language is done... stamped by his God
as fixed and final.
He is so fanatically influenced by France as a substitute for God,
that he insists France can take the Latin alphabet word -- "kippa,"
clearly a word in the Latin alphabet, and obliterate the Hebrew
word which existed long before the French word "kippa."
Simply to accommodate the French who are unfamiliar with Hebrew.
Replacing that Hebrew word, forever and ever, with that word,
"kippa," which has none of the form of the Hebrew word, which
Nazi Coughlan insists has been obliterated from the face of the earth.
Yes, gentle reader... NC insists that --
http://tinyurl.com/esrl7
is no more. Gone forever, because he insists his God... the French...
have willed it so.
But wait, gentle reader.... he stated that --
"nowhere did I state that Hebrew uses the Latin alphabet."
and he has stated --
"The word 'kippa' is Hebrew, Jim."
Now, gentle reader... correct me if I am wrong... but doesn't
the word "kippa" use the Latin alphabet??? Ummmm... but
he says that word, in the Latin alphabet is HEBREW. Oh, shit...
it looks like NC has been caught in a lie again...
because in stating "the word 'kippa' is Hebrew," he is stating
that Hebrew uses the Latin alphabet.
Gentle reader... "kippa" is not Hebrew. The Hebrew word
for the "skull cap worn by observant Jews" existed long before
any word such as "kippa," was created to also symbolize
the "skull cap worn by observant Jews." "kippa" was
developed from the sound of the Hebrew word, to conceive
of a French word to have that same etymological SENSE,
and nothing else. "kippa" is French. "kippa" did not
REPLACE and thus ABOLISH the Hebrew word. End of story.
Of course, there is only NC's lying that keeps his motor
mouth running, since he knows just how pitiless I have been in
ripping apart each and every word he has offered. Which is
why he needed to create a blog in which he knows I cannot
respond to his lies... he believes he is safe in his lies in his blog.
Just as he thought he was safe in his shrine to Hitler. The poor
man is left with nothing but hiding from truth and justice. A
sick . on the run from truth and justice. Proving without
a doubt that he is not Jewish, as he does not have the courage
necessary to stand before the bar of TRUTH and answer to
his claim that he is Jewish. Knowing he cannot prove it, but
insisting that he could prove it, if he wanted to, since he claims
that Israel will accept him as Jewish. ROTFLMAO.
Maybe he can get that Muslim gal, Sara, who he is apparently
banging on the side, to attest that he has been circumcised,
somehow making that proof that he is Jewish.
And I laughed... and I laughed... and I laughed... And I laughed...
and I laughed... and I laughed... And I laughed... and I laughed...
and I laughed... And I laughed... and I laughed... and I laughed...
Well... you get the idea.
> * See Nazi James Noles trip himself up by giving _two_ different
> answers concerning his lies in the space of 12 seconds ...
> http://minilien.fr/a0jtex
Poor Nazi Coughlan.
1) "I always insisted I was not Jewish" except for the episode in
which euroscum sought "revenge," which is always the excuse Nazi
Coughlan uses to claim that is the purpose of those who
support the death penalty. Of course, euroscum also insisted that he
was a one-man lynch mob, working "outside of a justice system."
And Nazi Coughlan helped pulled the rope to string up their mutual
tormentor, because they could not handle argument rationally.
2) 'I have over and over admitted that I said I was Jewish" during
that period in which euroscum, and his father figure, Nazi Coughlan
took "revenge" upon me, by over and over exposing my name, and
even calling the states to various "James Noles" to try and locate
my address and telephone number, which Nazi Coughlan posted
a number of times about various "James Noles," obviously not
all of whom could be the same person.
But see Nazi Coughlan get hammered over and over about his lie
that is Jewish, even as that lie rests dead in its coffin --
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dipshit_Gimmicks/gimmick_22.html
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dipshit_Gimmicks/gimmick_31.html
But his ego and the fact that his entire credibility rests upon his lie,
means he can never give it up. Not even if it would result in his
worst nightmare, Vishnu, not posting to AADP any longer. Which
means I can enjoy many pleasurable moments dissecting him piece
by little piece as his purple-vein throbs. Good times, gentle
reader... good times!!
> * One of the funniest .-ups yet ...Nazi Noles says that 'English
> is written in the English language' .. http://minilien.fr/a0jtjh...
>
See above, gentle reader, where Nazi Coughlan argues that
Hebrew is written in French. But of course the English language
is written in English. How else might someone who only reads
English understand what is written? My English here is written
in the "English language." Nazi Coughlan has this inability to
understand this because his English is quite shabby and his
French has a horrendous Arab-accent.
This was confirmed when he called my home and spoke to
my wife, who is native French. He hung up before I could get to
the phone, since he was cyber stalking me, having paid $300
to a U.S. detective agency to give him some information.
He knew he had hit gold with my wife speaking native French.
My wife then remarked upon his rather guttural French with
an Arab-accent. We still have lots of laughs about Nazi
Coughlan's cyber stalking of me, given we now have moved,
and have an unlisted number.
> * Better and better... Nazi Noles shows that he can't use that expensive
> copy of _The OED_ that he has, and that because the word 'clause' appears
> in the entry for 'if', he thinks that that means that 'if' is a clause ...
Heh... poor Nazi Coughlan is lying again... The entry for "if" is
EXACTLY "conditional clause." Not just "clause," which he
would claim means what I said was mistaken. I said "conditional
clause." I stand by my words that state "if" is a "conditional clause."
The Oxford English dictionary confirms that the definition of "if"
is a "conditional clause." See --
http://home.earthlink.net/~onetimeuse/if.html
The gentle reader should look at six different definitions for the
word "if," that state it is a "conditional clause." Just going to
definition A.1. a. and you will find the words "conditional clause
in pres. (or pres. perf.) ind.;"
How sweet it is. I just love it when there is no question about it,
and no way Nazi Coughlan can wiggle out of it, even though he
sweats blood in twisting and turning TRYING to hide the evidence.
He's also claimed to be a "lawyer" (ho ho ho), but said that
"confessions are not evidence." Perhaps he was confused about
the fact that he never confesses to his ignorance. But who needs
a confession when there is so much forensic evidence in his
words?
> go on, guys 'n' gals..ask him how a single word can be a clause ...
Why ask me? Ask the OED. Are you saying that a "single word"
can only have a "single word" as a definition? That's crazy. But
that's Nazi Coughlan. Apparently NC insists the word "verb"
cannot be an "abstract verb." Heh heh heh .
> better
> yet...ask him to post the definition of 'clause' from his _OED_.
Why would I need to do so, when the word "if," is what we are
arguing about? I suppose next you'll ask me to post the definition
of "scumbag," because you claim that since it defines you, you can
define the word "if." Many single words have definitions that are
long, composed of other grammatical terms. None of that has
anything to do with "if." The single word -- "IF," being defined
as a "conditional clause." Many nouns have a definition that
contains a verb. Does that mean the definition doesn't apply
to the noun? You're a regular fruitcake.
> He'll
> rant and rave.. but he won't post it. Here is my _apocalyptic_ destruction
> of him ... http://minilien.fr/a0ju6s
And here is the Oxford English Dictionary, Revised Version 3.0. The
very latest.
http://home.earthlink.net/~onetimeuse/if.html
Gee... "If" is a "conditional clause." Right out of the OED. The
"supreme arbiter" of the English language, but only when NC wants
it to be.
[1]
Here we go again...
You simply cannot make that claim lacking proof, Desmond. You could
say "I am AADP's Captain of the Pinafore," and even offer to sing it, and it
would have exactly the same credibility. Namely -- absolutely none, Desmond.
Although you appear crazy enough to actually go around singing that you
are the "Captain of the Pinafore," given how you go around singing that
you're Jewish.
You simply cannot claim you are Jewish, nor argue that others have to
prove you are not. It is your claim... the burden of proof is on you. Without
proof, the presumption of your claim is in the negative -- See -
http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/coa/opinions/1999/981331-1.htm
"the propounder bore the burden of proving..."
See --
http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html#shifting
"The burden of proof is always on the person asserting something."
See -
http://www.bcskeptics.info/resources/criticalthinking/irf.burden.html
"Burden of proof is a fallacy where a claimant asserts that he does not
have to prove his claim, but that his opponent has to disprove it."
See --
http://www.blupete.com/Literature/Essays/BluePete/Argument.htm#Assert
"One cannot prove a negative, thus, as the legal maxim will have it,
semper praesumitur pro negante, the presumption is always in the
negative. In the absence of the acceptance of a proposition being
true, the propounder, the person who advances the proposition
as being true, has the obligation to proving it to be true."
How many more logical and legal references must I demonstrate
to show just how worthless your claim is, Desmond? While
even you have noticed how absurd your claim is, as you insisted
it is "an UNKNOWABLE." Yet you claim to KNOW what you insist
is "an UNKNOWABLE."
You're not Jewish, Desmond. Show me one person aside from your
friend, grosvenor, who believes you. Just one. Shit, even your friend,
Darren called you a liar in your claim to being Jewish. And now John
has claimed that he believes the reason Q has killfiled you is because
of your continued lie that you are Jewish, as you make a joke of it.
You know that Earl would support you if he really believed you. So
why not just stop it, and we can move on? If you stop I'll not mention
that you ever claimed to be Jewish. I'll not make any case of it again.
You can feel satisfied that somewhere in the universe, on some far
distant planet, there is perhaps one rational person who believes you
are, and then dust your hands over that belief, while not making a joke
of your claim. While even you know deep in your heart that there is
no such person as "a rational person who believes you are Jewish."
|