On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 17:00:11 +0000, this_address_is_for_spam@yahoo.co.uk
(David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and
deansgate) wrote:
>Martin wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 16:49:11 +0000, this_address_is_for_spam@yahoo.co.uk
>> (David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and
>> deansgate) wrote:
>>
>> >Martin wrote:
>[]
>> >> So Bush and Blair aren't actually responsible for more deaths than Mrs
>> >> T's friend Pinochet.
>> >
>> >i don't know what gives you that idea. Just the numbers killed in the
>> >first few days of bombing in 2003 eclipse the total death toll of
>> >Pinochet- the latter reckoned at around 3000.The total body count for
>> >allied bombing will probably never be known, especially as, according to
>> >the 'allied forces'- "we don't do body counts."
>>
>>
>> Contradiction in there somewhere. If we don't know, you don't know.
>
>I don't know exactly, sure, but the likes of iraqbodycount.net give some
>idea of the figures, and they are probably on the conservative side-
>which would indicate that at least 9,000 civilians were killed by allied
>bombing alone (in the first two years.)
Few of the local killers wear uniforms. Are they classified as
civilians?
I don't know who or what to believe. but I can see that it isn't British
suicide bombers killing hundreds every day at random.
I turned on Agent 4.2 plonk posts cross posted to more than two
newsgroups. and re sampled a few hundred posts. As a result Donna and
many others have disappeared, probably forever.
--
Martin
|