On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:56:38 +0000,
this_address_is_for_spam@yahoo.co.uk (David Horne, _the_ chancellor of
the royal duchy of city south and deansgate) wrote:
>Hatunen wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:37:14 +0000,
>> this_address_is_for_spam@yahoo.co.uk (David Horne, _the_
>> chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate) wrote:
>>
>> >The Reid wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:37:20 +0000,
>> >> this_address_is_for_spam@yahoo.co.uk (David Horne, _the_ chancellor of
>> >> the royal duchy of city south and deansgate) wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >And that's not accurate, given that some dishes were actually created in
>> >> >the UK. There's nothing unusual about this- lots of cuisines adopt
>> >> >'foreign' elements, but after a while, it does become local,
>> >>
>> >> 99% of cuisines are probably once foreign
>> >
>> >What did European cooking do before the tomato!?
>>
>> Or the potato?
>
>Yes. I mean all European cuisine is just Peruvian in origin, innit? :)
No one's mentioned rice yet!
I think they ate a lot of bread, and other grain stuff, plus whatever
meat and veg was available.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
-- |