Let is be knownst that on Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:59:28 +0000,
this_address_is_for_spam@yahoo.co.uk (David Horne, _the_ chancellor of
the royal duchy of city south and deansgate) writted:
>Deeply Filled Mortician
>wrote:
>> I was quizzing your comment that it could manage something 'more
>> complex'. I definitely call bullshit on that one.
>
>Well, I'll call it back then. They're both capable of the same rhythmic
>complexity, except that garageband adds a lot more (put simply, harmony
>and melody.)
Uh... you missed the time factor, which was pretty important in this
case.
>Now, I'm certainly not one to argue that rhythm by itself
>can't be complex- indeed it can be supreme. (Think Andriessen's works
>for De Volkharding!) But once you add to rhythm, it does increase the
>compexity, and that's as simple as that. BTW, I personally find Hydrogen
>a little clunky, sorry. It's a bit like a rhythm only garageband
>withough the style, or the depth, or frankly, the possibilities.
Style, depth or possibilities?
It's all '.' with you folk. Disgusting.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
-- |