Deeply Filled Mortician
wrote:
> Let is be knownst that on Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:59:28 +0000,
> this_address_is_for_spam@yahoo.co.uk (David Horne, _the_ chancellor of
> the royal duchy of city south and deansgate) writted:
>
> >Deeply Filled Mortician
> >wrote:
>
> >> I was quizzing your comment that it could manage something 'more
> >> complex'. I definitely call bullshit on that one.
> >
> >Well, I'll call it back then. They're both capable of the same rhythmic
> >complexity, except that garageband adds a lot more (put simply, harmony
> >and melody.)
>
> Uh... you missed the time factor, which was pretty important in this
> case.
Garageband is quick too. Have you tried both, or are _you_ talking out
of your arse?
> >Now, I'm certainly not one to argue that rhythm by itself
> >can't be complex- indeed it can be supreme. (Think Andriessen's works
> >for De Volkharding!) But once you add to rhythm, it does increase the
> >compexity, and that's as simple as that. BTW, I personally find Hydrogen
> >a little clunky, sorry. It's a bit like a rhythm only garageband
> >withough the style, or the depth, or frankly, the possibilities.
>
> Style, depth or possibilities?
>
> It's all '.' with you folk. Disgusting.
I'm a music slut. What can I say? :)
--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://www.davidhorne.net/pictures.html http://soundjunction.org |