On Jan 15, 10:29 am, oyst...@nettkjenning.com wrote:
> J. Walker skrev:>http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/article2145145...
>
> > First home of modern man in Europe was RussiaThere are 4 central concepts in this story
>
> -first migration
> -settlement
> -modern human
> -Europe
>
> -The first migration from sub-Saharaen Africa - the 1st world if you
> like - was not 50.000 years ago, but 1.000.000 BC (eastward from the
> middle east) and 500.000 BC (westwards to "Europe"). Up to this point
> "primitive human beings" had been precent in Sub Saharen Africa since
> ca. 7.000.000 BC .
>
> -The first settlements took place in Euroasia (modern Middle East and
> southern Caucasus) and Southeastasia (modern Southern China) ca 8500 BC
> and 7000 BC respectively. Theese settlements were done independently
> from eachother.
>
> -Science claim modern human or homo sapiens was a result from a change
> in the human brain about 50000 BC. The humans from 7.000.000 BC when
> the development of shimpansee and human took different paths and up to
> 50.000 BC is therefore human beings with a less rafinated brain than
> "modern humen".
>
> -Unlike all other continents that is normally defined as "some sand,
> dirt and stone totally surrounded by water" one try to suggest that
> Europe is something different from any other continent. The reasons for
> this are religios and to some extent political. Through history it has
> been of value for the Church to distinguish the "civilazed Christian
> world" from the non-believing barbarians. The concept of "Europe" is
> very poor scientificly. If we stick to the definition above, we will
> end up with Euroasia as continent. If we use culture, etnicity and
> history of civilization as criteria, Africa north of Sahara, Europe and
> Asia minus south-east Asia is a much better definition of the European
> continent than the one you suggest.
>
> To sum up. For this article to fit into shelfmeters of scientific
> evidence, it must limit its analysis to "modern human beings". They
> were simply not around earlier than ca 50.000 years ago. Lift this
> strange criteria and we are left with that human kind migrated through
> the middle east to Asia and Europe 950000 and 450000 years earlier.
>
> If one goes though the tremendous documentation on where and why we got
> the first settlements, it is hard to believe one single article
> suggesting that settlements tok plece more than 40.000 years earlier.
> Does someone have any explaination for this?
>
> Jan
Dr Hoffecker, from the Russian Academy of Sciences in St Petersburg ?
|