And never forget, that AIDS was spread worldwide, deliberately, by the
Canadian fag working with Air Canada, as detailed in the documentary
book and film "AND THE BAND PLAYED ON".
Perhaps Harpo refused to attend because he did not want to be associated
with all the filthy disease-spreaders?
On 16 Aug 2006 10:28:58 -0700, "John Galt" wrote:
>Lots of wailing (or politicizing) of Stephen Harper not attending the
>AIDS conference -- but lets have a reality check, beyond what Hollywood
>and the liberal left are pitching ok?
>AIDS, or *ACQUIRED* Immune Deficiency Syndrome -- is just that, ACQUIRED.
>That means by and large, based on individuals choices, they ACQUIRE it;
>and by and large its not through blood transfusions et al -- its
>remains predominately passed on by intravenous drug use, and
>unprotected . -- where an individual knows the risks, and *chooses*
>to ignore them.
>Question: With AIDS now a manageable disease no longer a death
>sentence with current drug cocktails -- shouldn't world, international
>and goernment attention be 'better' focussed on curring horrible
>diseases that are not AQUIRED by individual (bad) choices -- but
>instead for things like cancer, alzheimers, etc -- for which the victim
>had no choice role to play in aquiring it?
>Rather than the liberal left using a lifestyle aquired disease as a
>means to attack a conservative PM -- perhaps they should just shut the
>hell up, and tell their friends to drop the drug needles and start
>wearing rubbers?
|