On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:49:07 +0100, d4g4hd@yahoo.co.uk (David Horne, _the_
chancellor (*)) wrote:
>The Reid wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:25:29 +0100, d4g4hd@yahoo.co.uk (David Horne,
>> _the_ chancellor (*)) wrote:
>>
>> >> PT is never going to be viable in low to near zero population areas.
>> >
>> >Most of the places you go to in your life on leisure are easily
>> >accessible by PT. You don't use it because you have a car. That's the
>> >way most people act. Fair enough, but don't pretend otherwise.
>>
>> you constantly pretend remote country areas are easily accessible by
>> PT, if we argue for hours you eventually say "ok, I'll settle for not
>> going" If you want to go hillwalking in the highlands an occasional
>> bus isn't going to get you onto the hill, to the fishing lake, the
>> birdwatxching site, the photographic location when you need to be
>> there.
>
>People manage it all the time.
Double entrendre day or a re-run of an old thread?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT3_UCm1A5I&mode=related&search=
>
>[]
>> >I think noise, and I think what makes most of it in my life. It ain't
>> >planes- most of us don't live near airports, or at 30,000 feet.
>>
>> Fine, so . anyone who is under your flightpath when you fly off all
>> over the place for weekends. Talk about totally selfish and only
>> seeing aspects YOU want to see.
>
>No, it's a question of what people hear the most, and as I said, most
>people don't live near airports, but nearly everyone hears cars.
I have a complaint. I can't hear the cars for the noise of planes passing just
above our roof.
--
Martin
|