Mike Hunt wrote:
: You weren't talking about vacationing in Beirut. You were talking
: about Rome. Rome is NOT Beirut. How do you equate danger to
: Americans in Rome to the danger level in Beirut? There is a big
: difference between being cautious and being illogical.
I am not equating Rome and Beirut, just as I don't equate a small
weapon with a huge bomb. Would you not want to avoid being a
victim of either? Look at your own illogic. Two risks don't have to
be same or equal for us to want to avoid both.
I have clarified it repeatedly that my concern with Rome is not the
danger to Americans today but if the US decides to attack Iran. Do you
know when British Jihadis are on the run, what's a favorite
destination? Take a guess. Rome is full of Jihadi cells.
Are there no places less dangerous than Rome? If there are such places,
what is wrong with Americans prefering them? |