Newbie wrote:
> Mike Hunt wrote:
>
> : You weren't talking about vacationing in Beirut. You were talking
> : about Rome. Rome is NOT Beirut. How do you equate danger to
> : Americans in Rome to the danger level in Beirut? There is a big
> : difference between being cautious and being illogical.
>
> I am not equating Rome and Beirut, just as I don't equate a small
> weapon with a huge bomb. Would you not want to avoid being a
> victim of either? Look at your own illogic. Two risks don't have to
> be same or equal for us to want to avoid both.
>
> I have clarified it repeatedly that my concern with Rome is not the
> danger to Americans today but if the US decides to attack Iran.
The US isn't going to attack Iran. We have too many forces tied up in
Iraq, and they will be tied up until Bush is no longer president. After
the fiasco in Iraq, I doubt the next president is going to want to go to
Iran. |