National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




Subject: Re: Retarded British fight to keep outdated Imperial measurements Posted on: Fri, 11 May 2007 01:10:00 +0200

Make credence recognised that on Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:06 +0200,
Martin has scripted:

>On Thu, 10 May 2007 22:43:18 +0100, d4g4hd@yahoo.co.uk (David Horne, _the_
>chancellor (*)) wrote:
>
>>Hatunen wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 10 May 2007 07:33:54 +0100, The Reid
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Wed, 09 May 2007 20:28:22 -0700, VainGlorious
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>This aversion to full immersion was partly because older Americans
>>> >>displayed an inability to grasp metric
>>> >
>>> >same anywhere. I have no idea how tall I am in metric.
>>>
>>> About ten years ago we were vsiting some friends in England. The
>>> wife wanted to know what I weighed, and I replied, "about 210
>>> pounds." She turned to her husband and asked, "How much is that
>>> in stone?"
>>
>>That's no surprise.
>
>Once I had worked out that an American doesn't refer to his own wife as "the
>wife"

Wife is generally a derogatory term. If you like them, use their name.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--