Anthony Matonak wrote:
> John Kulp wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:31:45 -0400, "J. Clarke"
>> wrote:
> ...
>>> Actually it's an example of the law being whatever you can convince
>>> a judge that it is.
> ...
>> I don't know why so many of you keep thinking a judge made this
>> decision. It was a jury, not a judge.
>
> Why let facts get in the way of a good urban myth? Once you have
> a good folk story you don't want to mess it up with facts and truth.
>
> Besides, everyone KNOWS coffee is harmless just like toothpaste,
> peanut butter, pet food and the like.
Actually the issue is that everyone KNOWS that coffee will burn you
other, apparently, than the Stupid Old Bat and the jury.
--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
|