National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




Subject: Re: Italy alarmed at early harvest of wine g.s Posted on: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:08:58 -0700

Your selective postings are so transparent...

You ignored my recent challenge about the NASA so-called 'models' being
nothing more than "What-if" scenarios. I have been saying this for
years here.

What is the hottest year(s) on record for the U.S. ?

By Andrew Bolt
Thursday, August 09, 2007 at 10:02am

Oops. It turns out that 1998 wasnıt the hottest year on record for the
US, after all.
Global warming must be working backwards, because NASAıs Goddard
Institute for Space Studies, having fixed some calculating errors, has
discovered that the hottest year was in fact 1934.
Thatıs not all, as Steve McIntyre explains:

Four of the top 10 are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939,
while only 3 of the top 10 are from the last 10 years (1998, 2006,
1999). Several years (2000, 2002, 2003, 2004) fell well down the
leaderboard, behind even 1900.
The new leader-board of the hottest recorded years in the US:
1934
1998
1921
2006
1931
1999
1953
1990
1938
1939
These figures apply only to the US, and the corrections - says McIntyre
- do ³not make any real difference to the world rankings², which
generally put 1998 as the worldıs hottest year since records were kept.
But two things should be noted.
First, that the most basic calculations behind the global warming
hysteria can be screwed up, and stay undetected for years.
Second, that NASA quietly changed these figures without any of the
press releases and alarmist reports that usually follow the discovery
of some data that will feed the fear.






In article , Earl Evleth
wrote:

> On 26/08/07 18:17, in article N4OdnfIaIY8HOkzbRVnyjgA@bt.com, "Knight Of The
> Road" wrote:
>
> >
> > What exactly are "anti-global warming idiots"?
>
> Idiots, exactly.
>